Posted in my life, neighborhood on April 20, 2012|
1 Comment »
Sheila and I made plans to go out to dinner on Tuesday night since our husbands are working out of town. We forgot it was the quarterly homeowner’s meeting but decided to skip the meeting in lieu of a nice relaxing dinner. The homeowner’s meeting had all of the ingredients for a drama filled night and we we’re not up to seeing our neighbors at their worst.
I picked up Sheila a little before six and we headed over to Hillstone in Cherry Creek for dinner. Hillstone has an upscale modern atmosphere mixed with a bit of casual sophistication. It’s the type of place one would expect to see a modern day Don Draper at the bar. Sheila and I had a wonderful dinner. It was great to get caught up with each other. As we left the restaurant I was amazed as the heads turned to check out Sheila. She’s a statuesque beauty who commands a presence in a room. I wondered if she felt like she was back on stage singing at the Met.
Having dinner with Sheila turned out to be a wise choice. The homeowners meeting turned into a ruckus. Our neighbor, Terry, was so appalled by the attendee’s behavior she left before the meeting ended to get a drink in order to settle her nerves. She said the meeting almost turned into a ballroom brawl. She was shocked to see her so called educated professional neighbors yelling and screaming at each other. I’ve been at meetings like this before. It’s quite shocking to see people let emotions get the best of them rather than discuss the facts of the situation. The board ended the formal public meeting and moved to another undisclosed location for a private executive session. Clearly, education and wealth doesn’t prevent one from acting ghetto.
The main topic of discussion was a homeowner’s desire to sell a half acre of their 1.3 acre lot. The covenants do not allow lots to be split. The homeowner is threatening to sue the board and the homeowner’s association (The board was sued about ten years ago and was victorious in court. The board has hired a real estate development lawyer who attended the meeting). The homeowner wants to sell their house 7,000 sq ft house but claims he can only get 3.5m for it. They have a pending contract to sell a half acre of their lot for 1.3m. He thinks he can still sell his house for 3.5m minus the half acre. The board and almost the entire neighborhood are against subdividing the lot because it will set a precedent for the rest of the neighborhood. I’m also against splitting the lot.
This property in question is located in the much more affluent west side of our neighborhood. The lots are bigger and the houses are architecturally significant and generally sell in the seven figures. Our house is in the much less expensive east side where the lots are smaller and almost all of the houses are mid century ranches.
The homeowner must have significant financial resources if he can afford to run this house along with the taxes and upkeep. Housekeepers, gardeners and the pool service come and go. I doubt the owner is in financial trouble. It is common knowledge that the homeowner inherited the property and is owned free and clear.
I see this as a case of simple greed. It can be interesting living amongst the one percent.
Read Full Post »